Tencent News brother apologizes

“News elder brother” is very powerful, is Tencent News “excellent employee”, this elder brother’s position is to refuse negative energy, pay attention to interesting, like to complain, until these two days because “celebrate more than one year” ahead of the charge event on demand, although “it’s about the company, I shut up is the best”, but elder brother couldn’t resist, wrote a “Chinese people don’t deserve to have spiritual life!”! No match! 》In the early morning of December 23, “brother newsman” hastily issued an apology, replaced the official in charge of the public account, and suspended the editor concerned.
As expected, I got the sentence in the author’s article: “every day I watch my peers being hammered, I can’t help saying two sentences. If I get into trouble with the company, I’ll be punished, too.
As a peer in the industry of “brother news”, I read the full text carefully to understand the main reasons for his rollover, so as to learn from the past.
As a person who wrote “come up with the idea of charging for the pop show on demand in advance, and suggest goose factory to add year-end bonus to it”, Lei Feng’s editor still holds his own “original view”: This is Tencent video’s trick, it wants to make money, and it has space to be found in the rules, I have no way, but I don’t like and support the secondary charging for VIP users, because I really charge money.
However, this does not prevent other stakeholders from stating their own reasons, such as the news brother of Renjia goose factory.
His point of view 1: VVIP is a problem of package gear, no one forces you to buy it.
VIP users see 6 sets more than ordinary users, and VVIP users see 6 sets more than VIP users. Isn’t that the gear of the service package? When you go to dinner, three meat and two vegetables are more expensive than two meat and one vegetable. Will you scold?
Besides, if you don’t pay, you don’t pay. No one forces you.
Point 2: it’s OK not to buy VVIP. Why publicize piracy?
“Support piracy” four words can be called so upright, it really shows the lower limit of personality.
Point 3: video platforms are poor and the content industry is miserable.
If you don’t want to watch the advertisement and pay for the content, then the craftsmen in China will starve to death.
Point four: paying is not expensive, good content needs paying support.
More than 30 yuan net red milk tea line up for 1 hour, worth! 10 yuan for a video member, steal money?
200 yuan lipstick, tens of thousands of lipsticks in a minute, cool! 5 yuan for an e-book, it’s painful for half a day.
News brother’s conclusion is more aggressive:
On the one hand, economic growth slows down, no one has enough food left, and advertising fees have peaked.
On the other hand, users support piracy, and they will be scolded for shooting bad plays and charging for good ones.
This is the current situation of China’s content market.
This is the reality that Chinese people are not worthy of spiritual life at all!
After all, the Chinese don’t deserve it.
In the last three sentences, a big pot came down from the sky. QQ, after developing a series of drills for its members, is well versed in the way of payment. Maybe Tencent video will follow the same old path. But when it comes to benefits, it’s about benefits. After a lot of talk, brother newsman wants to occupy the “moral highland”, which makes people very sad.
Never jeer at the target audience of your article!
For example, if your target audience is VVIP, you can make a mockery of the VIP who doesn’t want to be a VVIP, saying that they are stingy and don’t deserve to have a spiritual life, etc. VVIP people will feel very good after reading it, and feel very superior. In order to maintain this superiority, they will return to krypton VVIP next time.
But his goal is to persuade VIP to spend more money to buy VVIP, but he ridicules VIP to the utmost, and thinks that he is a kind of wise general.
Of course, the “news brother” was immediately backfired by the boiling “public opinion” after spraying “the people”, and honestly recognized the mistake: “the article is seriously inappropriate in terms of title, opinion and wording, we have recognized the mistake and deleted the article. Here, we apologize to you. “